tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7666748429233877989.post8738774347484781189..comments2021-06-10T09:36:33.421-07:00Comments on The Main Adversary: Lesson from the GOP LawsuitMark Newgenthttp://www.blogger.com/profile/12732833867125566921noreply@blogger.comBlogger1125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7666748429233877989.post-36388085161273606622008-01-12T11:32:00.000-08:002008-01-12T11:32:00.000-08:00The remedy would not have been too drastic if the ...The remedy would not have been too drastic if the violation had been about the actual process of passing a bill, or if there was a direct conflict with the Constitution as that is done from time to time when needed. I should also say when it is appropriate and not just because a judge believes it the right thing to do. If they do it out of their own personal convictions then they are in just as much violation as the legislature would be and therefore their ruling should be considered void by all. If you read Marbury you will see that the Marshall court understood that principle, which is something that has been lost today.David K. Kylehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/12508161846941771972noreply@blogger.com